|
Introduction
and Rationale
Many
people are interested in Internet connectivity in developing
countries around the world and want to know if connectivity
is a problem and the ways in which Internet users access online
resources. For the APRTC, a question we are frequently asked
is – How do agLe@rn students access your online courses? In
an attempt to get some answers to this question we conducted
a survey of our alumni and current participants in March 2003.
The question was sent out to about 200 individuals and we received
63 responses. All of APRTC’s main target groups were represented
with 19 respondents from academia, 13 from government organizations,
9 from NGOs and 21 from private sector companies.
Results
and Discussion
As
expected, very few of our students were using personal computers
at home to participate in the courses. Computers are still relatively
expensive in most developing countries and private ownership
is rare. Only about 3% indicated they were using this method.
The
next most commonly used access method was local Internet or
Cyber Cafes with about 25% of our students using this resource.
It appears these commercial community access providers are reasonably
accessible to many agLe@rn students in terms of both cost and
location.
By
far the most popular access method was to take advantage of
computers at work which were connected to the Internet. Just
over 70% of the respondents indicated that this was their most
common way of accessing courses. More and more, organizations
and institutions are “going online” and allowing their employees
to use their systems for professional development and other
work related purposes.
One
interesting result was that there were clear differences in
access methods depending on the sector in which a student was
employed. The vast majority of participants in NGO’s, government
offices and private sector businesses were using connections
from their workplace (78%, 85% and 100% respectively). In contrast,
students from academic institutions did not seem to take advantage
of their connections at work and about 75% of our academic participants
preferred to use local Internet Cafes. The primary reason for
this is the poor connectivity of most agricultural universities
in developing countries where the common practice is to connect
the entire university to the Internet through a single connection.
With hundreds of users (students and faculty) sharing this single
connection, the quality is definitely not good enough for comfort.
Raw
Data
For
those interested
in the raw results and differences between countries we have
compiled the results in the table below.
| Country |
Access
Method |
Total |
| Company
LAN |
Home |
Internet
Cafe |
| Australia |
2 |
- |
- |
2 |
| Botswana |
2 |
- |
- |
2 |
| China |
4 |
- |
- |
4 |
| India |
10 |
2 |
15 |
27 |
| Indonesia |
5 |
- |
- |
5 |
| Japan |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
| Kenya |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
| Malaysia |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
| Pakistan |
5 |
- |
1 |
6 |
| Philippines |
4 |
- |
- |
4 |
| Samoa |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
| South
Africa |
2 |
- |
1 |
3 |
| Taiwan |
3 |
- |
- |
3 |
| Vietnam |
3 |
- |
- |
3 |
| Total |
44 |
2 |
17 |
63 |
| Sector |
Access
Method
|
Total |
| Company
LAN |
Home |
Internet
Cafe |
| Academic |
5 |
- |
14 |
19 |
| Development
Agency |
1 |
- |
- |
1 |
| Farmer |
- |
- |
1 |
1 |
| Government |
11 |
1 |
1 |
13 |
| NGO |
6 |
1 |
1 |
8 |
| Private |
21 |
- |
- |
21 |
| Total |
44 |
2 |
17 |
63 |
|